Skip to content

fix: use workflow type name in WorkflowAlreadyStartedError#411

Merged
chris-olszewski merged 2 commits intomainfrom
olszewski/fix_update_with_start
Apr 6, 2026
Merged

fix: use workflow type name in WorkflowAlreadyStartedError#411
chris-olszewski merged 2 commits intomainfrom
olszewski/fix_update_with_start

Conversation

@chris-olszewski
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What was changed

Use workflow type name instead of the full proto. This matches other places in the file where this is accessed.

Was found as part of #410

Why?

TSIA

Checklist

  1. Closes N/A

  2. How was this tested:
    Updated test to assert value of workflow_type was string, observed failure, fixed implementation.

  3. Any docs updates needed?
    N/A

@chris-olszewski chris-olszewski requested a review from a team as a code owner April 6, 2026 20:16
@chris-olszewski chris-olszewski force-pushed the olszewski/fix_update_with_start branch from 1cc8cbc to fdcc56e Compare April 6, 2026 20:32
@chris-olszewski chris-olszewski merged commit ddb2762 into main Apr 6, 2026
7 checks passed
@chris-olszewski chris-olszewski deleted the olszewski/fix_update_with_start branch April 6, 2026 20:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants