Skip to content

Cleanup block storage encryption LA notice#655

Open
zliang-akamai wants to merge 1 commit intolinode:devfrom
zliang-akamai:zhiwei/cleanup-block-storage-encryption-la-note
Open

Cleanup block storage encryption LA notice#655
zliang-akamai wants to merge 1 commit intolinode:devfrom
zliang-akamai:zhiwei/cleanup-block-storage-encryption-la-note

Conversation

@zliang-akamai
Copy link
Member

📝 Description

Cleanup block storage encryption LA notice

@zliang-akamai zliang-akamai requested a review from a team as a code owner February 28, 2026 07:13
@zliang-akamai zliang-akamai requested review from Copilot, ezilber-akamai and vshanthe and removed request for a team February 28, 2026 07:13
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Removes outdated “not available to all users” notices related to block storage/disk encryption from public docstrings, keeping the client library documentation aligned with current product availability messaging.

Changes:

  • Removed availability disclaimer from Instance.disk_create disk_encryption parameter docs.
  • Removed availability disclaimer from Instance.rebuild disk_encryption parameter docs.
  • Removed availability disclaimer from VolumeGroup.create encryption parameter docs.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
linode_api4/objects/linode.py Cleans up disk encryption parameter docstrings for disk creation and rebuild.
linode_api4/groups/volume.py Removes block storage encryption availability note from volume creation docs.
linode_api4/groups/linode.py Removes disk encryption availability note from instance creation docs.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants