Skip to content

pyrefly report -> pyrefly coverage report#3340

Closed
jorenham wants to merge 2 commits into
facebook:mainfrom
jorenham:report->coverage_report
Closed

pyrefly report -> pyrefly coverage report#3340
jorenham wants to merge 2 commits into
facebook:mainfrom
jorenham:report->coverage_report

Conversation

@jorenham
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jorenham jorenham commented May 8, 2026

Summary

This renames the pyrefly report command to pyrefly coverage report. It's more specific this way, and makes is possible to add other commands related to type-coverage in the future (for example pyrefly coverage check to check that the coverage is above a given %).

The pyrefly report command still exists as a deprecated alias to pyrefly coverage report for the sake of backwards compatibility.

Test Plan

Added scrut CLI tests.

@meta-cla meta-cla Bot added the cla signed label May 8, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the size/s label May 8, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented May 8, 2026

According to mypy_primer, this change doesn't affect type check results on a corpus of open source code. ✅

@yangdanny97
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@maggiemoss

@meta-codesync
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

meta-codesync Bot commented May 11, 2026

@yangdanny97 has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this in D104669408.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@stroxler stroxler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review automatically exported from Phabricator review in Meta.

@meta-codesync
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

meta-codesync Bot commented May 11, 2026

@migeed-z merged this pull request in ab26c19.

@jorenham jorenham deleted the report->coverage_report branch May 11, 2026 18:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants