chore(ci): drop no-std CI jobs

[ZocoLini]

I dont know if i am forgetting something or i am removing more than what I should

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Removed no-std build verification from CI pipeline. No-std support is no longer maintained as part of the standard build checks.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 26ee06da-8f79-4f58-bbbc-0df11fe433bc

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 33cefc9 and eb82d49.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• .github/ci-no-std.yml
• .github/scripts/ci_config.py

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)

• .github/ci-no-std.yml
• .github/scripts/ci_config.py

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request removes no-std build verification support from the project's continuous integration pipeline. This includes deleting the dedicated no-std configuration file and removing the associated Python script logic, CLI arguments, and command mappings that handled no-std build checks.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
No-std CI Support Removal .github/ci-no-std.yml, .github/scripts/ci_config.py	Deleted the no-std CI configuration file and removed the run_no_std() function, --no-std-file CLI argument, run-no-std subcommand, and its command dispatch mapping from the CI configuration script.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Poem

🐰 No-std checks hop away,
The CI pipeline grows lean today,
Features fade with a gentle touch,
Simplicity we love so much!
One less path to maintain and test.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'chore(ci): drop no-std CI jobs' accurately and concisely describes the main change: removing no-std CI configuration and related scripts.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings (stacked PR)
• 📝 Generate docstrings (commit on current branch)

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch chore/drop-nostd-ci

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 66.90%. Comparing base (33cefc9) to head (eb82d49).

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##           v0.42-dev     #522      +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage      66.90%   66.90%   -0.01%     
=============================================
  Files            313      313              
  Lines          64757    64757              
=============================================
- Hits           43325    43324       -1     
- Misses         21432    21433       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
core	74.93% <ø> (ø)
dash-network	74.91% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 33cefc9
dash-network-ffi	34.76% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 33cefc9
dash-spv	68.26% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 33cefc9
dash-spv-ffi	34.76% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 33cefc9
dashcore	74.91% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 33cefc9
dashcore-private	74.91% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 33cefc9
dashcore-rpc	19.92% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 33cefc9
dashcore-rpc-json	19.92% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 33cefc9
dashcore_hashes	74.91% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 33cefc9
ffi	36.38% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
key-wallet	65.65% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 33cefc9
key-wallet-ffi	34.76% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 33cefc9
key-wallet-manager	65.65% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 33cefc9
rpc	19.92% <ø> (ø)
spv	81.11% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
wallet	65.68% <ø> (ø)

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.
see 4 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.