Skip to content

Add research gap replication planner#153

Open
firstedition0123 wants to merge 1 commit into
SCIBASE-AI:mainfrom
firstedition0123:codex/research-gap-replication-planner-16
Open

Add research gap replication planner#153
firstedition0123 wants to merge 1 commit into
SCIBASE-AI:mainfrom
firstedition0123:codex/research-gap-replication-planner-16

Conversation

@firstedition0123
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@algora-pbc /claim #16

Contributes to #16.

Summary

  • Adds a self-contained research-gap-replication-planner module for the AI-Powered Research Assistant Suite bounty.
  • Focuses on the gap-to-replication planning boundary rather than another broad assistant suite, evidence-grounding module, or protocol-trace module.
  • Generates auto peer-review findings for unsupported claims, citation gaps, statistical risk, and domain-specific methodology checks.
  • Scores reproducibility confidence from raw data, clean pipelines, environment locks, test sets, reported outputs, and previous attempts.
  • Ranks under-replicated research intersections using unresolved/negative-result signals, replication count, corpus activity, lab fit, and previous reproducibility friction.
  • Includes synthetic sample data, requirement mapping, Node tests, CLI demo, SVG frame, and a 4s MP4 demo.

Why this slice is distinct

Existing #16 submissions cover broad assistant suites, evidence grounding, protocol traces, quality gates, and readiness engines. This PR specifically targets the research-gap-to-replication decision point: deciding which unresolved corpus intersections a lab should replicate first, and what evidence is needed before execution.

Demo

  • research-gap-replication-planner/docs/demo.mp4
  • research-gap-replication-planner/docs/demo.svg
  • cd research-gap-replication-planner && npm run demo

Demo output:

Planner status: hold
Top opportunity: alzheimer + crispr + single-cell
Top replication decision: prioritize
Top peer-review flag: Claim has no supporting evidence artifact.
Weak reproducibility project: circadian-metabolomics-2026
Audit hash: de1b1fa44644dc24...

Verification

cd research-gap-replication-planner
npm run check
ffprobe -v error -select_streams v:0 -show_entries stream=codec_name,width,height,duration -of default=noprint_wrappers=1 docs/demo.mp4
cd ..
git diff --check
rg -n 'api[_-]?key|private[_-]?key|password|secret|token|wallet|ssn' research-gap-replication-planner

Local results:

research-gap-replication-planner tests passed
Planner status: hold
Top opportunity: alzheimer + crispr + single-cell
Top replication decision: prioritize
Top peer-review flag: Claim has no supporting evidence artifact.
Weak reproducibility project: circadian-metabolomics-2026
Audit hash: de1b1fa44644dc24...
codec_name=h264
width=1280
height=720
duration=4.000000
git diff --check passed
secret pattern scan returned no matches

AI-assisted with OpenAI Codex; I reviewed and verified the implementation before submitting.

The SCIBASE bounty has already rewarded broad assistant-suite, protocol-trace, and evidence-grounding modules. This contribution targets the research-gap-to-replication planning boundary: peer-review risk, reproducibility confidence, and lab-fit opportunity ranking in one dependency-free package.

Constraint: Must avoid credentials, live services, and duplicate issue 16 submissions

Rejected: Broad research assistant clone | overlaps with existing rewarded modules

Confidence: medium

Scope-risk: narrow

Directive: Keep this module self-contained unless maintainers ask for integration

Tested: npm run check; ffprobe demo.mp4; git diff --check; secret pattern scan

Not-tested: Maintainer reward decision and Algora payout
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant