add lossless-permissive NodeFilter proposal (#122)#123
Merged
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Adds
propose/LOSSLESS-PERMISSIVE-NODEFILTER-PROPOSE.mddocumenting the tactical lossless-permissiveNodeFiltercontract from #122.Why now
Documents the no-regret subset that stops silent filter drops without locking the broader #117 frame.
Highlights
extra="forbid"onNodeFilterand per-kind applicability checks (design)._coerce_filterstays as the lossless JSON-string path.find_v2/search_v2/neighbors_v2(nofilterondescribe_v2in this tree).Tests
Docs-only; baseline unchanged.
Out of scope
Refs: #122
Made with Cursor