Skip to content

DRAFT Single probe compiled condition#11469

Draft
jpbempel wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
jpbempel/single-probe-compiled-condition
Draft

DRAFT Single probe compiled condition#11469
jpbempel wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
jpbempel/single-probe-compiled-condition

Conversation

@jpbempel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What Does This Do

Motivation

Additional Notes

Contributor Checklist

  • Format the title according to the contribution guidelines
  • Assign the type: and (comp: or inst:) labels in addition to any other useful labels
  • Avoid using close, fix, or any linking keywords when referencing an issue
    Use solves instead, and assign the PR milestone to the issue
  • Update the CODEOWNERS file on source file addition, migration, or deletion
  • Update public documentation with any new configuration flags or behaviors
  • Add your completed PR to the merge queue by commenting /merge. You can also:
    • Customize the commit message associated with the merge with /merge --commit-message "..."
    • Remove your PR from the merge queue with /merge -c
    • Skip all merge queue checks with /merge -f --reason "reason"; please use this judiciously, as some checks do not run at the PR-level
    • Get more information in this doc

Jira ticket: [PROJ-IDENT]

@datadog-prod-us1-6
Copy link
Copy Markdown

datadog-prod-us1-6 Bot commented May 27, 2026

Pipelines

Fix all issues with BitsAI

⚠️ Warnings

🚦 13 Pipeline jobs failed

DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-java | check_debugger   View in Datadog   GitLab

🔧 Fix in code (Fix with Cursor). Execution failed for task ':dd-java-agent:agent-debugger:forbiddenApisMain' due to forbidden field access: java.lang.System#out. See gradle logs for details.

DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-java | exploration-tests-method-jackson-databind   View in Datadog   GitLab

🔧 Fix in code (Fix with Cursor). Unhandled error during deserialization configuration.

DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-java | spotless   View in Datadog   GitLab

🔧 Fix in code (Fix with Cursor). Spotless check failed due to format violations in ConditionInstrumenter.java and CapturedSnapshotConditionTest.java. Run './gradlew spotlessApply' to fix all violations.

View all 13 failed jobs.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 0e99ebf | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@pr-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

pr-commenter Bot commented May 27, 2026

Debugger benchmarks

Parameters

Baseline Candidate
baseline_or_candidate baseline candidate
ci_job_date 1780073418 1780073764
end_time 2026-05-29T16:51:44 2026-05-29T16:57:30
git_branch master jpbempel/single-probe-compiled-condition
git_commit_sha 858b33c 0e99ebf
start_time 2026-05-29T16:50:19 2026-05-29T16:56:05
See matching parameters
Baseline Candidate
ci_job_id 1725611345 1725611345
ci_pipeline_id 115960943 115960943
cpu_model Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz
git_commit_date 1780072816 1780072816

Summary

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 10 metrics, 5 unstable metrics.

See unchanged results
scenario Δ mean agg_http_req_duration_min Δ mean agg_http_req_duration_p50 Δ mean agg_http_req_duration_p75 Δ mean agg_http_req_duration_p99 Δ mean throughput
scenario:noprobe unstable
[-19390.721ns; +20660.930ns] or [-6.609%; +7.042%]
unstable
[-26.822µs; +33.985µs] or [-8.042%; +10.190%]
unstable
[-36.363µs; +46.927µs] or [-10.430%; +13.460%]
unstable
[-225.609µs; -8.599µs] or [-16.836%; -0.642%]
same
scenario:basic unsure
[-6.067µs; -0.019µs] or [-2.275%; -0.007%]
same same unstable
[-274.939µs; +22.155µs] or [-21.914%; +1.766%]
same
scenario:loop same same same unsure
[-78.021µs; -3.553µs] or [-0.846%; -0.039%]
same
Request duration reports for reports
gantt
    title reports - request duration [CI 0.99] : candidate=None, baseline=None
    dateFormat X
    axisFormat %s
section baseline
noprobe (333.515 µs) : 309, 358
.   : milestone, 334,
basic (295.799 µs) : 289, 302
.   : milestone, 296,
loop (8.973 ms) : 8969, 8978
.   : milestone, 8973,
section candidate
noprobe (337.096 µs) : 304, 370
.   : milestone, 337,
basic (295.164 µs) : 289, 301
.   : milestone, 295,
loop (8.974 ms) : 8969, 8980
.   : milestone, 8974,
Loading
  • baseline results
Scenario Request median duration [CI 0.99]
noprobe 333.515 µs [309.417 µs, 357.613 µs]
basic 295.799 µs [289.297 µs, 302.301 µs]
loop 8.973 ms [8.969 ms, 8.978 ms]
  • candidate results
Scenario Request median duration [CI 0.99]
noprobe 337.096 µs [304.082 µs, 370.11 µs]
basic 295.164 µs [289.083 µs, 301.246 µs]
loop 8.974 ms [8.969 ms, 8.98 ms]

@dd-octo-sts
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

dd-octo-sts Bot commented May 27, 2026

🟢 Java Benchmark SLOs — All performance SLOs passed

Suite Status
Startup 🟢 pass

SLO thresholds are defined here based on automatically generated metrics. A warning is raised when results are within 5% of the threshold.

PR vs. master results
Scenario Candidate master Δ (95% CI of mean)
startup:insecure-bank:iast:Agent 14.05 s 13.97 s [-0.3%; +1.4%] (no difference)
startup:insecure-bank:tracing:Agent 13.00 s 13.06 s [-1.6%; +0.7%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:appsec:Agent 16.70 s 16.48 s [+0.0%; +2.7%] (maybe worse)
startup:petclinic:iast:Agent 16.53 s 16.70 s [-2.4%; +0.4%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:profiling:Agent 16.54 s 16.64 s [-1.8%; +0.7%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:tracing:Agent 15.86 s 15.81 s [-1.5%; +2.1%] (no difference)

Commit: 0e99ebfa · CI Pipeline · Benchmarking Platform UI


Load and DaCapo benchmarks can be triggered manually in the GitLab pipeline. Results will appear in the Benchmarking Platform UI after completion.

@jpbempel jpbempel force-pushed the jpbempel/single-probe-compiled-condition branch from 5aee89e to 0e99ebf Compare May 29, 2026 16:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant