Hello!
I might do something wrong, but I had to apply the following patch to the boost interval library (v1.82.0) in order to build it successfully using the emscripten toolchain (v3.1.51).
diff --git a/include/boost/numeric/interval/hw_rounding.hpp b/include/boost/numeric/interval/hw_rounding.hpp
index 46d452e..4211079 100644
--- a/include/boost/numeric/interval/hw_rounding.hpp
+++ b/include/boost/numeric/interval/hw_rounding.hpp
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <boost/numeric/interval/rounded_arith.hpp>
#define BOOST_NUMERIC_INTERVAL_NO_HARDWARE
+#undef BOOST_NO_FENV_H
// define appropriate specialization of rounding_control for built-in types
#if defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(BOOST_NO_FENV_H)
This reverts to the c99 impl, which builds and works fine as far I can tell.
From what I gathered, the definition of BOOST_NO_FENV_H occurs in include/boost/config/platform/wasm.hpp:23 and commenting it out also fixes the issue.
This is, however, very hacky and I was wondering if there way a cleaner way to achieve the same results.
Hello!
I might do something wrong, but I had to apply the following patch to the boost interval library (v1.82.0) in order to build it successfully using the emscripten toolchain (v3.1.51).
This reverts to the c99 impl, which builds and works fine as far I can tell.
From what I gathered, the definition of
BOOST_NO_FENV_Hoccurs ininclude/boost/config/platform/wasm.hpp:23and commenting it out also fixes the issue.This is, however, very hacky and I was wondering if there way a cleaner way to achieve the same results.